• Gold Price

  • Silver Price

  • Kindle Edition -- On Sale for $2.99

Tip Jar

  • Barron's quote

Reviews
and News

Important Disclaimer

  • This site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
    The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Copyright

  • © 2004 - 2012
    Michael J. Panzner

« Private Equity Isn't Wearing Any Clothes, Either | Main | Connor Boyack Reviews Financial Armageddon »

September 25, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451591e69e200e54efd1f2c8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference It's Ugly Down There:

Comments

What I got out of this is perhaps not what you intended. I am struck by these statements: "Personally, I can't seem to balance how the analysts refuse to paint the true picture, while the banking side continues to fund the problem... Ivy told me Credit Suisse required her to maintain an overall rating on the builders and she couldn’t simply downgrade them across the board. Maybe banking relationships are more important than coming out with what’s really happening and what the real long term fall out will be."

What if you had a bank (or any company) in which the corporate culture was the opposite of this? - a company in which employees are promoted (or not) based on their willingness to paint a true picture of what's really happening? That company would, in the long run, have an advantage over the competition.

Mike, the author of this post seems to feel like he needs to attack others. I found it quite bothersome.

I am mystified by SD's comment.

"needs to attack others"?????

Where's the photo referenced in the following?--

"For my clients, the photos speak for themselves. For the good folks reading this piece, I have included a photo of what the buyers of the condos are looking at, if they close and move in. I doubt anyone will move into some of these towers."

If you're going to visit "ground zero", take and post some pics or maybe they're included in the book referenced at the top of this page. Either way, photo documentation would really benefit any piece written on this historic event unfolding now in America. Or maybe I'm just no smarter than a green mango and have overlooked the link :)
Kurt

Great article! It made for an interesting read on an otherwise boring news day - how is it fridays are always upbeat at the moment?

With reference to those financial analysts - f**king b**tards!

I'm not sure about your 18 month backlog but I do reckon house building will decrease at least 50% next year to around 400,000. That'll be only in areas where the need is high or there's tax concessions to turn brownfield sites into homes.

All about site with FOREX

The comments to this entry are closed.


Information, Bulk Sales, Etc.?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


When Giants Fall - NYPL Presentation

  • National Debt Clock

Highlighted Blogs

Blogroll

Other Resources

Google



  • WWW
    Financial Armageddon


Finance Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog powered by TypePad