• Gold Price

  • Silver Price

  • Kindle Edition -- On Sale for $2.99

Tip Jar

  • Barron's quote

Reviews
and News

Important Disclaimer

  • This site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
    The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Copyright

  • © 2004 - 2012
    Michael J. Panzner

« The Beginning of the End of Free Trade? | Main | Today's Lesson: Bad Economy = Bad Stock Market »

December 27, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451591e69e200e54fc77dc28834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wall Street Excretia:

» Wall Street Excretia from wall street
Bookmarked your post over at Blog Bookmarker.com! [Read More]

Comments

It's sort of silly to take one subjective article with an obvious bent, compare it to another subjective article with an obvious bent and expect your readers to agree one is truth and the other is "excretia" purely based on a couple lame one-liners. What value you are adding here?

I've written nearly 400 posts since I started this blog, a great many of which have highlighted the continuing and often vast differences between what is actually happening on Main Street (and elsewhere) and what Wall Street says is happening. In my opinion, this is just one more example of a kind of pseudo-analysis that derives from conflicted interests, groupthink, wishful thinking, extrapolation bias, and herding behavior.

As far as I can tell, there is no evidence provided in the first article to back up the strategist's sanguine outlook, though I acknowledge that this could be the fault of the reporter. (I suppose a cynic might say that Bloomberg must have been trying to undermine the bullish case?)

In contrast, the second article includes news and data from retailers, trade groups, and retail industry researchers, along with anecdotal reports of widespread discounting. Perhaps I am naive, but that does not strike me as "clear evidence" that the U.S. consumer "did not roll-over during the holiday shopping season."

They should discount heavily, not just after holidays, but throughout the year. Most of the items in the mass-market stores are now low quality crap and well overpriced for what they are.

I've seen firsthand this season how hard it is to find a specific, quality item for consumer purchase. Boots, cookware, home furnishings are expensive at the high end and often overpriced (in value terms) at the middle-lower end.

I sometimes wonder if the most expensive part of selling manufactured items today is the shipping cost from China, Pakistan, and Vietnam.

I read both of those articles when they came out. Juxtaposing them here shows up the morale-boosting in the 1st article. 'Herding' is exactly right. Us 'consumers' are sheep being steered to the pen for shearing. Problem is, there's too few frolicky lambs left to be fleeced at the mall cuz so many have been slaughtered in the mortgage scam.

A front-page article for the December 17 issue of Automotive News states that Bob Nardelli at Cerebus' attempt to get Chrysler repaired has now run out of money and they can't borrow any more. They are limited to the $10 billion they have on hand. Cerebus' five major banks have failed in two attempts to take $4 billion of loans off the books even though they were heavily discounted. The banks were the usual suspects: JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Bear Stearns and Goldman Sachs.

A vote of no confidence in Cerebus and Chrysler is the assesment of the article's author Bradford Wernie.

Its more than that. Much more. I believe this is more proof that liquidity is not the issue but that solvency is.

Davidowitz also said that this year we have 5% more retailers than last year, so that 3% increase in sales is spread over more stores. He predicts a big shakeout in retailing next year as the reality of decreasing earnings takes it toll on the industry. Of course if the Fed continues to flood the country with more money, perhaps some of the retailers can forestall the inevitable with more borrowing. The Fed stopped publishing M3 saying that number is “obsolete.” I’m skeptical. Why not continue to publish M3 as it costs almost nothing to calculate it from the data they collect?

"Yet no matter how much cold-water reality is thrown in the face of the so-called experts in the financial community, they just keep talking a delusional -- er, bullish -- game."

Sounds like the good old days (2000-2001). Cheerleaders, take the field...

The comments to this entry are closed.


Information, Bulk Sales, Etc.?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


When Giants Fall - NYPL Presentation

  • National Debt Clock

Highlighted Blogs

Blogroll

Other Resources

Google



  • WWW
    Financial Armageddon


Finance Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog powered by TypePad