• Barron's quote

Like My Site?

Reviews
and News

Important Disclaimer

  • This site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
    The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Copyright

  • © 2004 - 2009
    Michael J. Panzner

« Entirely Predictable | Main | Lots More Opportunities for the 'Experts' to Be Wrong »

May 27, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451591e69e200e5529b767b8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Innocent Bystanders:

Comments

So in the text, Eric Glazer come up with "Words can't describe how bad the problem is here." to describe the problems with HOAs not being able to collect their dues. Eric has never seen or experienced real hardship if having flowers planted 2-3 times a year instead of 6 is seen as a big problem.

The chief function of HOAs is to force people to paint their houses all the same color and to ensure that all dog poop deposited in the neighborhood is emitted by dogs weighing less than 25 lbs. Given that older neighborhoods functioned pretty well as natural communities, it's hard to see how losing HOAs is going to do more than cause a spike in non-beige paint sales.

The chief function of HOAs is to force people to paint their houses all the same color and to ensure that all dog poop deposited in the neighborhood is emitted by dogs weighing less than 25 lbs. Given that older neighborhoods functioned pretty well as natural communities, it's hard to see how losing HOAs is going to do more than cause a spike in non-beige paint sales.

Unfortunately,HOA's are responsible for a lot more important stuff than dog poop and approving paint color schemes, like paying for insurance for all the condo's, paying for outdoor lighting, taking care of a pool if there is one, maintaining the parking lot and other functions which cost real money. If the HOA's finances become unstable, the condos may not be marketable at any reasonable price. It is a real problem, which may eventually have to be dealt with by the state legislature in the state concerned. I suspect that Florida, California and Arizona will be the most impacted states.

Unfortunately,HOA's are responsible for a lot more important stuff than dog poop and approving paint color schemes, like paying for insurance for all the condo's, paying for outdoor lighting, taking care of a pool if there is one, maintaining the parking lot and other functions which cost real money. If the HOA's finances become unstable, the condos may not be marketable at any reasonable price. It is a real problem, which may eventually have to be dealt with by the state legislature in the state concerned. I suspect that Florida, California and Arizona will be the most impacted states.

This is just one of many reasons I prefer to live outside of a subdivision development on in condos. You are legally and financially bound to numerous strangers who may or may not be responsible or pleasant to be around. With people today, you are not assured you'll be getting a pleasant experience packed in like sardines. On a bigger lot you're at least less affected by the disaster that may be next door. The bigger the better. In my area $900K estate homes are within spitting distance of trailer homes, but nobody is affected or cares.

The fact that there is so much tract housing in America is a sad testimony to poor planning and overcrowding. Prices getting too high to live on at least 3/4 acres or so affordably on the side of a regular street are an economy's way of saying things are too crowded and maybe growth should go to other areas/cities. We sometimes forget that tract homes or tightly packed ones outside of urban areas are a post WWII development.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Information, Bulk Sales, Etc.?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


When Giants Fall - NYPL Presentation

  • National Debt Clock

Blogroll

Google



  • WWW
    Financial Armageddon


Finance Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog powered by TypePad