• Barron's quote

Like My Site?

Reviews
and News

Important Disclaimer

  • This site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
    The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Copyright

  • © 2004 - 2009
    Michael J. Panzner

« The Ripple Effect | Main | In the Second Inning »

July 03, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451591e69e200e55384f6868833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference All Fired Up?:

Comments

Speaking about models and about normal ... there is a reason to why these mathematical models (such as the risk model for CDOs) fail, and the fancier the models, the worse the crash. For details: Mandelbrot and Hudson, 2004, The (mis)behavior of markets. 328pp. In short, the findings are:

- the models Wall Street uses for risk, from simple "beta" to the most complicated risk analysis for mortgages, use the normal distribution to model risk
- the normal distribution has a relatively low risk of big desasters (e.g. about two in one million that something six standard deviations out of the ordinary will happen)
- reality of markets does not follow the model: the risk of desasters is much higher. For example, the crash of 1929 and of 1987 happened in the same century
- therefore, economists run full speed into a brick wall, again and again.

A national Char Policy towards current and future vacant foreclosed houses owned by banks would all but solve the housing bubble crisis for house owners/mortgage payers.

Would the holding banks/mortgage companies take it in the shorts or would the mortgage insurance companies? We already know the Amercian tax payers are.

"Since last year's accident, firefighters have begun inspecting and marking the city's 10,000 vacant houses with ``their own form of graffiti,'' said Reed. They use red spray paint on the doors or front walls of the buildings to cite potential dangers, she said." I'm impressed by the initiative these firefighters are showing. It shouldn't be their job to assess dangers in empty houses, but since no one is doing it for them, they're stepping in. I find that admirable.

We are working on a project to map these fires. SpotCrime.com

The comments to this entry are closed.

Information, Bulk Sales, Etc.?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


When Giants Fall - NYPL Presentation

  • National Debt Clock

Blogroll

Google



  • WWW
    Financial Armageddon


Finance Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog powered by TypePad