Like My Site?

Reviews
and News

Important Disclaimer

  • This site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
    The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Copyright

  • © 2004 - 2009
    Michael J. Panzner

« Cash Is King Again | Main | Wrong. Wrong. And Wrong. »

July 23, 2008

Underperformer...or Visionary?

Time once described Jim Bunning, the Hall-of-Fame pitcher and 76-year old Republican junior senator from Kentucky, as "The Underperformer" because of his lackluster record on Capital Hill.

But consider the following (thanks to Wikipedia):

Bunning was also the only member of the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs to have opposed Ben Bernanke for Chief of the Federal Reserve. He said it was because he had doubts that he would be any different from Alan Greenspan....

On December 6, 2006, Bunning was one of only two senators...to vote against the confirmation of Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense claiming that 'Mr. Gates has repeatedly criticized our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan without providing any viable solutions to the problems our troops currently face. We need a secretary of defense to think forward with solutions and not backward on history we cannot change.'

Along with the comments he made today, as reported by Bloomberg in "Fannie, Freddie Rescue Plan May Cost $1 Trillion, Bunning Says," it might also be said that Bunning will eventually be seen as some sort of visionary.

A government rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would require taxpayers to pay "way" more than the $25 billion estimated by the Congressional Budget Office, potentially as much as $1 trillion, Senator Jim Bunning said.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson "hasn't told us the truth about this bill," Bunning, a Republican from Kentucky, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television today. "Why would you put in a backstop of unlimited amounts of money if you weren't going to need it."

Paulson on July 13 asked Congress for authority to increase credit lines to Washington-based Fannie Mae and McLean, Virginia- based Freddie Mac, buy shares in the firms and give the Federal Reserve a "consultative role" in overseeing their capital requirements. The proposals are meant to restore confidence in the government-sponsored enterprises, which own or guarantee almost half of the $12 trillion of U.S. home loans outstanding.

The House of Representatives is set to vote today on the rescue plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as part of broader legislation aimed at alleviating the worst housing slump since the Great Depression. Bunning called the plan "horrendous."

"What is good about this bill is the fact that maybe it shores up Fannie and Freddie for a temporary basis," Bunning said. "What it does not do is change the model of Fannie and Freddie. It does not give the regulators the power to make the changes needed in Freddie and Fannie to make them viable entities for the future. That is why I object."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451591e69e200e553b3b7778833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Underperformer...or Visionary?:

Comments

I had heard very little of Senator Bunning prior to the bailout plan being discussed. I wish he was my Senator. At least there is one Senator who stands up for the Constitution and the American people.

$25 billion? Didn't Paulson make clear that $25 billion is just "the monthly payment". $25 billion a month for say 60 months, just like a car loan!

I think that, once the derivatives market comes crashing down (not started in the USA but from elsewhere in the world) then losses will be a lot more than $1tn

Althugh Bunning got it right here, I'd hardly call him a visionary. Reactionary maybe. But visionary? I don't think so.

Bunning is a loser. He didn't even bother to vote on the bill. All talk.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

When Giants Fall - NYPL Presentation

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


  • Barron's quote

Information, Bulk Sales, Etc.?

  • National Debt Clock

Blogroll

Google



  • WWW
    Financial Armageddon


Finance Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog powered by TypePad