For a long time, greedy and conflicted industry executives, toothless regulators and clueless policymakers accepted and promoted Wall Street's self-serving delusion that the banking system and the economy could only benefit from financial globalization and a widespread dispersion of risk.
Of course, this fantasy proved to be a nightmare when history's biggest credit bubble burst. The so-called experts failed to take into account that when financial systems are closely connected, it pretty much ensures that major shocks that might once have remained fairly contained would instead reverberate far and wide.
Other allegedly knowledgeable individuals, including TV pundits and most strategists at major investment banks, made similarly asinine arguments about the impact that a contracting U.S. economy would have on growth in the rest of the world. In their view, other developed and developing nations would carry on booming as before, regardless of what happened here.
Again, the "smart money" failed to realize that instead of being "decoupled" -- the trendy buzzword of the overpaid analytical set -- the economies of most, if not all, countries were strongly linked because of the powerful and long-running tide of globalization, among other things. Hence, a downturn in America, which accounts for a quarter of global GDP, would naturally have an adverse impact on growth in other nations.
For those who know how to think (which excludes the "experts" already noted above), then, the following Agence France-Presse report, "OECD Sees Growth Easing in Top Economies," should come as no surprise at all.
Growth of the seven biggest economies in the world is set to weaken further, the OECD signalled on Friday, pointing also to a mixed outlook for big emerging economies.
The warning fits the picture of sharp slowdown in many advanced countries which has emerged so far this year as the repercussions of the credit crisis, and high oil prices, reached ever deeper into activity and lending.
A similar signal for the eurozone from European Central Bank on Thursday, when the bank held its key rate steady, pushed down the euro against the dollar, a movement which continued on Friday.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development said its composite leading indicators for June "indicate a continued weakening outlook for all the major seven economies."
It also said: "The latest data for non-OECD member economies tentatively point to expansion in China and Brazil and a downturn in India and Russia."
The indicator for all 30 countries in the OECD fell by 0.6 points in June and was a full five points lower than in June last year, the OECD said.
The figure for the US economy fell by 0.2 points and was 5.4 points down over 12 months.
The eurozone indicator fell by 0.8 points in June for a 12-month fall of 5.2 points.
The June figure for Japan was unchanged but showed a fall of 4.1 points over 12 months.
The OECD explained that its indicator, which had to be used with caution, "is designed to provide early signals of turning points (peaks and troughs) between upswings and downswings in the growth cycle of economic activity."
Other main figures were: Britain down 0.8 in the month and 4.8 points over 12 months, Canada down 1.1 and 3.9 points, France down 0.9 and 5.1 points, Germany down 0.9 and 5.4 points and Italy down 0.7 points and 4.5 points.
The indicator for China was steady in June and rose by 0.8 points on a 12-month basis. The figure for India fell by 1.5 points in May and was 4.4 points down from the May, 2007 level.
For Russia, the indicator fell by 1.2 points in May, but showed a rise of 0.9 points over 12 months.
The indicator for Brazil fell by 2.2 points in June but rose by 1.4 points from the level in June last year.
On Thursday, the ECB, in holding its key short-term rate at 4.25 percent, acknowledged that in the eurozone "growth figures for mid 2008 will be substantially weaker than for the first quarter of the year."
The bank, and its president Jean-Claude Trichet, stressed however, that medium-term inflation would not be allowed to remain high. On balance, the markets interpreted these remarks as indicating an easing of prospects for a rise in eurozone interest rates, and the euro fell.
On Monday, the International Monetary Fund forecast that eurozone growth was expected to fall significantly, but that the zone was likely to be spared a recession.
On July 29, the IMF had forecast the Japan seemed on course for a "modest" slowdown.
And two days later, US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said he expected "moderate" growth of the US economy this year. Data showed growth of 1.9 percent in the second quarter.
"While our economy faces substantial difficulties that will continue to be a drag on growth in the short-term, it is important to remember that our long-term fundamentals are strong," he said.
On July 28, Chinese state media, reporting on a meeting of the Communist Party politburo, said: "Challenges and difficulties are growing for maintaining fast and stable economic growth, due to rising international uncertainties and problems in the domestic economy."
Chinese growth slowed to 10.4 percent in the first half of the year from 11.9 percent for all of 2007.








economy faces(substantial) difficulties : meaning what??
a drag on growth in the short-term : meaning what ???
long-term (fundamentals): this is a DUZZY please explain!!!!
Me thinks they talk with forked tongue and a fogged in brain on the same level as snake oil
Posted by: roger | August 09, 2008 at 05:18 PM
The figure for the US economy fell by 0.2 points and was 5.4 points down over 12 months.
And this was after the government handed out a 100+ billion dollars to everyone.
Thats alright, they will do this every quarter until we get back on track. Thats right, if you are in debt, borrow some more...What a joke this country is.
Posted by: the_economist | August 10, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Nouriel Roubini stated recently that he remains bullish on the global economy. So far so good here in south central Kansas. The corn and beans look fantastic. The smart producers locked in their prices some time ago. For weeks now there have been ads in the local papers for a major manufacturer of agricultural equipment for everything from floor sweepers to several categories of engineers. A manufacturer in my town who had outsourced 70% of its production of hydraulic pumps to its plant in Mexico has brought almost all of that back due to poor fquality and increased demand by their two major customers Catepillar and ohn Deere. The aerospace industry in Wichita can't find enough help either. Plenty of other jobs go unfilled as well.
Its not all food though. Homes that go up for sale stay that way for a long, long time however. I haven't seen much new construction in a while. One small strip mall and a chain restaurant in Maize, an expanding bedroom community of Wichita. People around here have a pretty good understanding of whats happening elsewhere.
I believe Roubini qualifies some of his comments about how long this downturn will last in the United States by saying something to the effect of "if the government doesn't screw it up". Yeah, right. The people in charge ARE the proplem. And just like in Japan they'll pull every wrong lever, turn all the wrong dials and push the exact wrong buttons at just the right time.
Guaranteed.
Posted by: Snappy Tom | August 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Despite the stats, there are still 100K and 150K jobs posted on employment sites. Here's 3 sites from About.com's newest top 10 employment site list -
http://www.realmatch.com
http://www.linkedin.com
http://www.indeed.com
Lots of high paying jobs...seems contradictory to the stats but its true
Posted by: janet | August 10, 2008 at 01:26 PM
Actually, the note points more to decoupling, than coupling. China is still growing at more than 10%, and lost a mere 10% of its growth. What you are seeing is massive decoupling and this is the result of the loss in value of the dollar.
Decoupling is the future, and the more the US economy becomes more unproductive and unable to export, the stronger the trend.
Once other nations take over production from the US they become the consumers. Then the debt ridden US is bypassed in favor of those that can pay for goods with goods. The US can only pay for goods with debt, be it federal debt or consumer debt, or debt in the form of dollars that can be converted to real US assets.
This conversion of dollars to US assets is part of an increasing vicious cycle where productive US companies and industries are bought, the production and intellectual property from those firms is then exported, and the US is left without the means to production. To whit, GE and Westinghouse selling their nuclear reactor divisions to Japanese companies Toshiba and Hitachi. Other examples include the invasion of Lukoil, Citgo, NEC purchase of RCA/GE IP, Russian takeover of Stillwater, the only Platinum/Palladium producer in the USA, and on and on.
When all the US consumer has is dollars who wants or needs the US consumer? The world is bidding the US adieu.
Posted by: PrintFaster | August 10, 2008 at 02:06 PM