The bulls went ga-ga over today's "better-than-expected" data on U.S. gross domestic output. But if you look at how the figure was derived -- which seems to be beyond the capabilities of most Wall Street strategists, TV pundits, and stock traders -- you find that the "good news" should have had a big fat asterisk (*) next to it.
In "Thank You Cash for Clunkers," for instance, EconomPic details a less-than-reassuring reason for the jump through the use of an eye-opening graphic:
Motor vehicles added a whopping 1.66% of the 3.5% growth in Q3 GDP. More specifically, motor vehicle output was up... wait for it... 157.6% on an annualized basis.
Source: BEA
In "Don’t Break Out the Champagne Yet: Cause for Concern in GDP," the Wall Street Journal's Real Time Economics blog relies on an old faithful -- the written word -- to dissect a so-called sign of recovery that is actually much less than it seems:
It’s great to be growing again, but two lines in Thursday’s GDP report have the potential to be temporary and warrant caution.
The first one is the critically important 3.4% pop in personal consumption expenditures, which was the biggest gain since the first quarter of 2007, when the housing bubble was still in the early stages of deflating. A very large chunk of that came from car sales, which accounted for a full percentage point of the overall increase in GDP for the quarter. The car sales increase was driven in large part by the temporary cash-for-clunkers program. After surging in July and August, retail car sales dropped 10.4% in September, suggesting the auto sector won’t provide such a big boost again any time soon.
The other piece was homebuilding, which rose for the first time since 2005. Home building didn’t just rise; it jumped 23.4%, which contributed another half percentage point to GDP growth. It is possible that a real upturn in housing has begun. But there might also be temporary factors at play, most notably the federal homebuyer’s tax credit. That’s got better prospects of being extended than cash-for-clunkers, but it won’t last forever. That, and still-large inventories of unsold homes in many markets, could be a weight on the housing recovery.
In short, Fed officials are surely pleased to see the GDP increase. But they’re likely to be a little wary of some of these temporary factors and reluctant to extrapolate above-trend growth from the numbers.







to day is the 80th. anniversary of the crash of 29.
and what have we learned ? well we have learned that
we haven't learned a single thing.
Posted by: roger | October 29, 2009 at 09:32 PM
"The bulls went ga-ga over today's "better-than-expected" data on U.S. gross domestic output."
You know, most of the time I really pity the American publicfr their suffering at the hands of governemnt liars.
But when I see regular Americans repeatedly falling for the same lies, only to get burned once again, it starts looking like willful ignorance. Blind stupidity just hoping that somehow 'this time it will be different'.
This time you've got it coming, morons.
Posted by: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg | October 30, 2009 at 08:44 AM
Michael I recommend you use 160x600 skyscraper ad unit on the left..better conversion rate, I guarantee it.. and use a 300x250 right below your articles
Posted by: roberto gusto | October 30, 2009 at 01:45 PM
Has anyone noticed that the National Debt meter on this web site hit $12 trillion this week? In the meantime, Republicans support a big buildup of US forces in Afghanistan at a reported cost of approximately $1 million per soldier per year. I guess the religious nutcases haven't figured out that it is their children who will have to deal with the national debt debacle. So much for family values.
Posted by: Rocky | October 30, 2009 at 02:14 PM
interesting I would say!
http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/blog/macro-view/gdp-rises-but-other-indicators-point-down/1175/
Posted by: roger | October 30, 2009 at 05:29 PM
The bankers do what they do and we act surprised.
We are fooled or we are stupid, probably both.
Posted by: Mr Neithercrat | November 01, 2009 at 09:45 PM