Like My Site?

Reviews
and News

Important Disclaimer

  • This site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
    The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Copyright

  • © 2004 - 2009
    Michael J. Panzner

« 'This Is Now Worse than Long-Term Capital Management' | Main | Greedy Enough to Make You Sick »

November 10, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451591e69e200e54f7fcf4f8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference So Much For Being Hedged:

Comments

I've been saying these things for years. Excellent post. The idiot banks thought they could "lay off the risk", so they took on even more risk. Amazing but true.

Michael, I'm not that technical, but I get your general point. You're giving us a timely warning, seeing how some ordinary individuals are now getting worried and looking how to secure their pension funds with warrants. And presumably the risk will be expensively re-priced when things get worse.

But since we have past events to learn from, surely history won't repeat itself exactly. I'm sure everybody is keen to avoid a late-20s-style US deflation, and also a Germany-1923-type hyperinflation. What do you consider is the MOST LIKELY course of events from here, rather than the worst-case?

Ownership of ACA:
27.7% Bear Stearns
13.3% Stephens
12.6% Third Avenue Trust
11.0% Chestnut Hill
10.4% Perry Capital (up from 5.5% in 14A)

With apologies to The Graduate, "Young man, I have one word for you: collinearity."

The author may be making some prescient points -however, he neglected to mention that the CDS sold by ACA do not require payments in the event the related CDOS are downgraded, or when there is a loss in market value. Payments on CDS (other than Contingent CDS, which are a whole 'nother story) are required when there is an actual cash loss. Therefore, like Mark Twain's death, the rumour of the demise of ACA and its ilk are greatly exaggerated.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

When Giants Fall - NYPL Presentation

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


  • Barron's quote

Information, Bulk Sales, Etc.?

  • National Debt Clock

Blogroll

Google



  • WWW
    Financial Armageddon


Finance Business Directory - BTS Local
Blog powered by TypePad