Despite all the evidence to the contrary, mainstream types keep insisting on two things: that what we are going through right now is a recession -- albeit a severe one -- and the worst is (or will soon be) over.
Hogwash.
In fact, if I could point to one story that explains why both claims are almost certainly wide of the mark, it would be the following report from the Associated Press, "Hospitals Cutting Services, Staff Amid Recession."
Why? Because it reveals that the one sector that held up relatively well during prior recessions is now in serious trouble -- and that the finances of many health care providers are so impaired that they are willing to defy a long-time industry aversion to economizing and retrenchment.
Ailing from the recession, many U.S. hospitals have had to begin making painful cuts to patient services and laying off staff, as previous cost-cutting hasn't been enough, an industry survey found.
In previous recessions the health care industry has held up well, but this time hospitals and other health care businesses are hurting. Besieged by financial pressures including more needy and uninsured people, hospitals now are making tough decisions that affect their patients and communities.
The American Hospital Association found 22 percent of hospitals that responded to its March survey have reduced services since the economic crisis began in September. Those services range from outpatient clinics and behavioral health programs to patient education and home health care after discharge.
University Medical Center of Southern Nevada had to close its mammography center and started phasing out outpatient cancer treatment in November, said spokesman Rick Plummer. The decision was made right after Nevada's legislature, squeezed because high unemployment and foreclosure rates have slashed tax revenue, cut about $30 million from the Las Vegas safety-net hospital's charity care and Medicaid funding.
"It's a domino effect," Plummer said. "We had to make some difficult choices."
He said there women can get mammograms at plenty of other places, but it's tougher for patients getting chemotherapy and other lengthy cancer treatments.
"Very few other community providers stepped up to the plate," Plummer said, so some patients without health insurance but not poor enough for Medicaid have had trouble getting care. Some have had to make long drives for treatment or even move.
Meanwhile, nine of 10 hospitals said they cut expenses in the first quarter, with eight in 10 cutting administrative spending. Other strategies include eliminating jobs, selling assets, reducing overtime, cutting staff hours, freezing salaries, cutting benefits and reducing supply costs. In addition, some hospitals are considering mergers to reduce costs.
Just under half the hospitals have cut staff, and the number resorting to mass layoffs - 50 or more employees at once - is up.
And while total employment at hospitals grew somewhat in 2008, even as millions of jobs were lost in other industries, hospital employment grew by only 0.1 percent each in January and February and was flat in March. That's according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics.
For the first quarter of this year, 43 percent of hospitals said they expected to lose money, up from 26 percent in the first three months of last year. About one in three hospitals saw a drop in the ratio of income to what they must pay creditors. Declines in such measures of financial health can lead creditors to demand immediate repayment of loans.
Meanwhile, many hospitals are seeing increased interest expenses, insurers taking longer to pay their bills, more difficulty or inability to borrow money and other problems. That's led more than three-fourths of hospitals to delay, stop or scale back building projects or upgrades to medical or information technology.
The survey was sent to all 4,946 community hospitals in the country, and 1,078, or 22 percent, responded. Data was collected from March 5 through March 27. The hospital association said the respondents generally represented all types of hospitals, such as urban, suburban and rural.








Interesting because the ZERO of them all, Alan Greenspan, strongly advised Americans to go into health sciences. The Grand Plan is all manufacturing jobs to China, all IT jobs to India, and what's left for the US is health sciences jobs as a means to care for the baby boomers.
Of course, training or retraining in health sciences is a specialized field and a multi-step, 3-5 year process. How you pay for a roof over your family's head, food on the table, income, books and tuition, ah, Alan did not elaborate, but you can bet that charging anything to a credit card would help his banker buddies. It helps you only if you can declare bankruptcy.
On the other side of the coin, someone needs to look at the number one Republican lobbying firm, Fierce, Isakowitz, and Blalock, devoted to keeping health care profits as high as possible. Another look at the medical school training in India, because India excels in math training (remember, IT jobs are there). Math and chemistry are the foundation of medical training, although the largest labor union in the US, the American Medical Association, would never want you to realize it. X-ray readings in the US should already be shipped to India. We have the copper in place. There is no reason for high charges on radiology readings. Once you open the Pandora's box on globalization, nothing goes back into the box the same way.
Posted by: Omitted Kingdom | April 27, 2009 at 10:58 PM
Money comes first.money is God,money is the most powerful
drug in the world.people come last! If you think hospitals
have problems then you you should take a good look at the
sanitation in the food business... you've already seen some
headlines and they where bad,when times get rough the very
first pink slips go to the dishwashers/ janitors with dismal
results,Federal State supervision/inspections are a joke
the lower you are on the food chain the bigger the shaft you get,
the higher on the food chain the bigger the golden parachute
Posted by: roger | April 27, 2009 at 11:05 PM
A US CORPORATE PIG FARM POSSIBLE FLU EPICENTER « Culture of Life News A
very interesting article
Posted by: roger | April 27, 2009 at 11:19 PM
another source with meat on the bone:http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200905/imf-advice
Posted by: roger | April 28, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Isn't it about time you removed the word "coming" from your tagline? Hogwash isn't close to how I'd describe it but I understand not everyone likes salty language.
Posted by: Constantine | April 30, 2009 at 12:23 PM