One reason why the financial crisis has been so devastatingly far-reaching stems from the sheer number of eruptions that helped bring it about.
Hence, while the focus has been on putting out nearby fires, other would-be infernos continue to smolder, poised to burst into flames with little or no warning.
To give one example, while the bulk of policymakers' efforts are now centered on bringing the charred remains of the U.S. banking system back to life, other equally serious problems continue to fester, as Larry Doyle reminds us in a post for his Sense on Cents blog entitled "Uncle Sam’s Dirty Little Secret":
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it, does it make any noise?
If an agency is sitting on billions in losses but nobody asks about it, can we forget about it?
If an entire group of banks is sitting on hundreds of billions more in losses, and the media is not even aware of this banking system, can we pretend they don’t exist?
Oh, if only we could, perhaps our economic life would be so much simpler.
While Uncle Sam and the media can choose to overlook these institutions, the losses are real and will serve as a drag on our economy and nation for the foreseeable future. Yet, they receive very little attention. Fortunately, Bloomberg shed a hint of light on part of this problem today in writing, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac in Limbo as Geithner Seeks More Time:
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will remain in limbo as the U.S. Treasury secretary said the government doesn’t have time now to deal with the future of the two mortgage-finance companies it seized in September.
“We did not believe that we could at this time — in this time frame — lay out a sensible set of reforms to guide, to determine what their future role should be,” Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told the Senate Banking Committee in Washington today. “We’re going to begin a process of looking at broader options for what their future should be.”
Doesn’t have time or doesn’t want to admit that these agencies represent an ongoing and enormous drag on our economy? How so? Fannie and Freddie hold 50% of the mortgages in our country. These entities are most likely sitting on hundreds of billions in embedded losses currently with limited prospects to generate real revenue. They have no viable business model at this point in time. As a result, rather than entering into an unpleasant and economically harmful dialogue, Geithner chooses to sweep this under the rug. How can Tim do this? Because Uncle Sam has allocated, if not necessarily set aside, funds for these agencies to offset future losses. As Bloomberg highlights:
The remainder of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s $400 billion U.S. Treasury lifeline should still be “sufficient” until the government decides how to restructure the companies, Federal Housing Finance Agency Director James Lockhart said in June 3 testimony to a House subcommittee. Washington-based Fannie Mae and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac have already requested $84.9 billion in taxpayer aid through the Treasury’s program to buy the companies’ preferred stock to keep them solvent.
Over and above swimming in a sea of losses, both Freddie and Fannie are effectively rudderless. Fannie Mae’s acting CEO, Herb Allison, was recently appointed to oversee management of TARP funds at Treasury. Freddie Mac’s acting CEO, John Koskinen, had resigned and only returned when beseeched. While Koskinen has committed to retaining the role of chairman of Freddie, he can’t get out of his daily Freddie Mac responsibilities quickly enough as the WSJ reports, Freddie’s Accidental CEO Tries to Shed Job.
The dirtier little secret hidden by Uncle Sam is embedded within the Federal Home Loan Bank system. Why? After Uncle Sam, the FHLB system is the second largest creditor in our country with approximately $1.2 trillion in outstanding debt. While Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s portfolios are chock full of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS backed by conforming size loans), the portfolios within the FHLB system (12 regional banks) are stuffed with Jumbo mortgages, Alt-A, pay-option ARMS, and sub-prime. In short, lots of toxic assets and lots of embedded losses hidden by the artful deceit of the relaxed mark-to-market accounting standard.
Where are we going with these future wards of the state? I project that in 2010, we will see these 14 entities (Freddie and Fannie and 12 regional FHLBs) combined into one large government owned housing finance entity.
Shhhhh . . . don’t tell anybody!!
Freddie and Fannie could have $200-$400 billion in yet to be recognized losses. I wonder if Timmy Boy is aware of this. Or if he cares?
Posted by: Independent Accountant | June 19, 2009 at 05:33 PM
Not in same league as Fannie & Freddie (about $1.6 million or so), but the big "Four-Oh" was reached today: 40 bank failures so far this year, compared to 25 all last year.
The latest:
First National Bank of Anthony, Anthony, KS
Cooperative Bank, Wilmington, NC
Southern Community Bank Fayetteville, GA
Read about all of them at "The Bank Implode-O-Meter at http://bankimplode.com/blog/category/fdic-failed-banks/
Posted by: Peter of Lone Tree | June 19, 2009 at 11:07 PM
And yet, no word from Congress or the Obama administration about how they "need to be reformed" or how maybe bankers need to forego bonuses or postpone retirement until they reach 90.
Wonder why that is?
Odd how quiet that jackass Pete Peterson, the CFR guru and all around putz, is about the screwups of the Wall Street and D.C. banking class, yet goes guns blazing against the working slob's Social Security.
Funny that.
Posted by: farang | June 19, 2009 at 11:44 PM