Through the years, some research studies have found that when consumers have too many choices, that can leave them feeling frustrated or indecisive. However, a recently published meta-analysis of 50 published and unpublished experiments that investigated "choice overload" actually came to a different conclusion: consumers generally respond positively to having many choices.
Of course, that's all well and good when people have plenty of money to spend, businesses are seeing a steady stream of paying customers, and profitablity is not being constantly undermined by aggressive competition, higher financing costs, and other pressures. Under those circumstances, as CNNMoney.com reports in "Dumped! Brand Names Fight to Stay in Stores," some merchants are deciding that less is better.
Don't be shocked if you can't find your favorite salad dressing or mouthwash on your next trip to Wal-Mart.
Large retailers -- including Wal-Mart, the world's biggest -- are wrestling with having too many types of brand-name products. At the same time, shoppers are buying less and looking for bargains.
So unless a particular brand is a top seller in its category, it's getting knocked off the shelf -- and sometimes getting replaced by a cheaper store brand.
For example, Wal-Mart recently removed Glad and Hefty-branded storage bags from shelves, replacing them with its own lower-priced Great Value brand, according to the parent companies of both products.
In the case of Hefty, parent Pactiv Corp. (PTV) told CNNMoney.com that Wal-Mart reversed its decision, and will return its products to shelves this spring -- after Pactiv agreed to make the Great Value bags that will sell alongside the competing Hefty product.
"Hefty was off Wal-Mart's shelves, but we are being brought back," said Matt Gonring, spokesman for Pactiv Corp.
Bill Pecoriello, CEO of market research firm ConsumerEdge Research, expects Wal-Mart and other sellers will trim several name-brands across categories in coming months, or negotiate deals to get better pricing.
According to Pecoriello, those categories at greatest risk of losing brands are everyday-type purchases such as household products, toiletries and food staples.
These are also categories in which retailers have aggressively pushed their own house brands.
"If you consider the economics of this, if Wal-Mart can build customer loyalty for its own brand, which is also cheaper-priced and cheaper to stock than name-brands, then it will," he said.
Heavyweight
Moves such as this are significant given Wal-Mart's heavyweight status in the retail industry.
"Any change that Wal-Mart makes with its product assortment has enormous implications for the entire industry," said Ali Dibadj, senior analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.
Wal-Mart declined comment for this story.
Wal-Mart is not the only one doing this, according to Dibadj. He says leading drug store chains, including CVS and Walgreens, grocers such as Kroger (KR, Fortune 500), and Wal-Mart's rival discounter, Target (TGT, Fortune 500), are also looking to simplify their store shelves.
In good economic times, product variety is a must for retailers. But in down times, when shoppers aren't buying much, variety can be a burden.
"Wal-Mart's a little fed up," said Lora Cecera, retail expert and partner at strategy consulting firm Altimeter Group. "I think the feeling is that as these companies keep extending their [product] lines, it's only causing confusion for shoppers and not really driving them to buy more products."
As a consumer, she asked, "Do I really need to decide between 15 different types of toothpaste when I go to a store?"
Dawn Willoughby, vice president-general manager of Glad brand for the Clorox Co. (CLX, Fortune 500), agreed.
"On an industry level, we've been talking about simplifying product assortment for a long time," said Willoughby. "If you walk into a Wal-Mart or another large retail chain, there are so many products on shelves that it does make it harder to shop."
Let's make a deal
Besides cutting clutter, industry experts say Wal-Mart and other retailers are looking for more lucrative deals from suppliers on both prices and advertising.
In one recent example, according to published reports, Wal-Mart removed Arm & Hammer liquid laundry detergent from most of its stores. But the discounter brought back the product after Arm & Hammer boosted its advertising for the product at Wal-Mart.
Arm & Hammer parent Church & Dwight (CHD) did not return calls for comment. Other consumer product makers -- including Colgate-Palmolive and Procter & Gamble -- either declined comment or did not return calls.
Said Dibadj, "Perhaps one consideration in which product to cut is based on which company gives [Wal-Mart] the best deal."
Citing the Hefty example, he said "these threats can become quite aggressive, such as delisting and subsequent relisting after a compromise.
Altimeter Group's Cecera believes consumers stand to win from the retailers' moves.
"In this recession, consumers have certainly become less discriminating with what they buy," said Cecera. "Consumers have rushed to value prices, and they are buying generic brands."
She said retailers' own brands have grown their market share by between 2% to 6%.
This newfound affection for store brands is "sticking," said Dibadj. He cites his firm's recent survey finding that 77% of consumers who traded down to less expensive private label products are happy with their decision.










Dawn Willoughby, vice president-general manager of Glad brand for the Clorox Co. (CLX, Fortune 500), agreed.
"On an industry level, we've been talking about simplifying product assortment for a long time," said Willoughby. "If you walk into a Wal-Mart or another large retail chain, there are so many products on shelves that it does make it harder to shop."
Are you freaking kidding me? As far as the big dogs go, they don't want you to have more choice, they want you to have one choice - theirs! So do most people stay away from Wal-Mart or Target because there are 12 brands of toothpaste and not just three? This whole process just encourages near monopolies. It's a disturbing trend that limits choice and innovation. Make two brands and let the masses choose from that alone. Corpocracy rules, in more ways than one..........
Posted by: mike | February 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM
If the product was made in China - Wal-Mart will give them priority. Period. Anything for them to make an extra penny and then multiply that by the 100 million that they'll sell of the item.
And as long as China funds are deficits - thus ensuring that the unemployment and food stamps payments from the Fed and State are made - lots of smiles!!!
Posted by: MichaelN | February 15, 2010 at 10:44 PM
having many choices. may be coming to an end,
Truck Tonnage index went into free fall in January 2010
source USA today 2-11 -10
Posted by: roger | February 15, 2010 at 11:26 PM
Moin from Germany,
over here non brands have already market shares of almost 40-50 percent in every product category.....
Thanks in large part to the dominant posistion ( close to 50 percent )of German discounters ( ALDI, LIDL, PENNY etc ). They are maily selling their own brands ( which are very often produced from brands.... )
The only important brand refused to do this was Nestle....
Recently Aldi has sharply increased the store opening in the US.... And after the housing bubble popped in the UK their market share spiked......
I expect that this trend is not temporary and will sooner or later hit the German mark....
The owners of ALDI ( two brothers ) are the richest Germans by a wide margin...... ;-)
Posted by: jmf | February 16, 2010 at 01:08 AM
"Citing the Hefty example, he said "these threats can become quite aggressive, such as delisting and subsequent relisting after a compromise.
Altimeter Group's Cecera believes consumers stand to win from the retailers' moves."
Ahh, yes, consumers win from retailers bullying their suppliers using their monopoly positions? Oh hang on ...
Who is Altimeter Group, some lobbying firm paid to pimp for the big retailers? Typical MSM `expert opinion'.
Posted by: Michael | February 16, 2010 at 07:32 AM
So, It is politically impossible for the strong economies of Europe to pass a bailout, it is politically impossible for Greece policy makers to pass sufficient budget cuts, if budget cuts are implemented then it will just push Greece further into debt deflation, a default by Greece will cause a run on the European banking system, the ECB has no legal authority to purchase Greece’s bonds, if Greece gets bailed out the EU will need to confront similar problems with Spain, Italy, Ireland, and Portugal which have a combined GDP larger than Germany, and if they all get bailed out Germany itself will be bankrupt. Did we say the markets hate uncertainty?
Euro Crisis
Posted by: euro crisis | February 16, 2010 at 07:37 AM
I would think household items are fine since I am unemployed and only make household and food purchases.
Posted by: Slowly going broke thanks | February 16, 2010 at 09:09 AM
OK, who voted for George W. Bush? C'mon, fess up. What were you thinking?
Posted by: Blurtman | February 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM
what were you think voting for BO?
Posted by: Slowly going broke thanks | February 16, 2010 at 12:58 PM
I agree with the Aldi comments. We buy their store brands for many items and our grocery bills have gone down. Of course, I then go to Wegman's for the specialty items we like, such as pesto and fresh mozarella, so they aren't as low as they could be! :)
I also agree that there is a choice overload for some products. How many different types/tastes of toothpaste do Crest and Colgate make? A LOT! I also don't get the choice in toilet paper from one manufacturer - with aloe, softer, etc. Some things just don't matter that much to me, I guess.
Posted by: Mar | February 16, 2010 at 01:29 PM
This post could have been titled "A Swan Song for the Niche Player."
Posted by: angryfutureexpat | February 16, 2010 at 01:39 PM
It is really posted well and it is appreciative. Thanks
Posted by: Penny Stocks | February 18, 2010 at 03:30 AM
Great info! I love the steep decline in choices of toilet paper. All the items listed (except for mouthwash) are necessities and we'll keep buying them, but when it comes to toilet paper my only requirement is that it not feel like sand paper.
Now if they'll only turn their attention to cereal next. I can't believe an entire supermarket aisle is devoted to so many different types and sizes. And, by the way, I gave up buying cereal when I found out they use genetically modified plants.
Posted by: sharonsj | February 19, 2010 at 01:53 PM